Filing A Patent Pro Se Links


Couldn't open rss feed in /links/filing_a_patent_pro_se_page_2.php
Couldn't open rss feed in /links/filing_a_patent_pro_se_page_2.php
<< 1 2 3 >>




Trademarks Recommended Products


Filing A Patent Pro Se News

PATTON v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW - Leagle.com


PATTON v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW
Leagle.com
1 Richard Patton (Claimant), pro se, petitions for review of an adjudication of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) holding him ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. In doing so, the Board affirmed the factual findings of ...

and more »

Read more...


Hedy Lamarr was both movie star and inventor - Kansas City Star


Hedy Lamarr was both movie star and inventor
Kansas City Star
In 1942, the folks at the US Patent Office issued her patent No. 2292387, for her invention of a "Secret Communication System." Hedy Lamarr, glamorous Hollywood star. Hedy Lamarr, glamorous genius inventor. That's the gist of Richard Rhodes' "Hedy's ...

and more »

Read more...


Cancellation of trademark registration ok as sanction for failure to comply ... - Lexology (registration)


Cancellation of trademark registration ok as sanction for failure to comply ...
Lexology (registration)
Reviewing the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the US Patent and Trademark Office to enter summary judgment against a pro se litigant for failure to comply with discovery orders, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ...

and more »

Read more...


Falling Short of the North Pole - New York Times


New York Times

Falling Short of the North Pole
New York Times
He studied at the Royal Institute of Technology and in his late 20s conducted experiments in geomagnetism and aero-electricity in the Arctic before being appointed head of the Technical Department of the Swedish Patent Office, a position he held until ...

and more »

Read more...


STATE v. BURKS - Leagle.com


STATE v. BURKS
Leagle.com
Our error patent review reveals, and the state concedes, the prematurity of this appeal caused by the trial court's failure to rule on motions for new trial and for post-verdict judgment of acquittal. On January 26, 2011, the defendant was convicted of ...

Read more...


Site Navigation

Recommended